Получает ли efetch () Bio.Entrez все метаданные статьи PubMed?
Интересно, есть ли у Bio.Entrez 's efetch()
извлекает все метаданные статьи PubMed, используя PMID в качестве входных данных. Под всеми метаданными я имею в виду, имеет ли PubMed больше метаданных, чем что efetch()
извлекает.
Например, я вижу, что для PMID 23954024
, efetch()
извлекает реферат, который содержит немного меньше информации, чем реферат на веб-сайте PubMed ( http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23954024):
efetch()
:
"AbstractText": [
"Rotator cuff tendinopathy is a common source of shoulder pain characterised by persistent and/or recurrent problems for a proportion of sufferers. The aim of this study was to pilot the methods proposed to conduct a substantive study to evaluate the effectiveness of a self-managed loaded exercise programme versus usual physiotherapy treatment for rotator cuff tendinopathy.",
"A single-centre pragmatic unblinded parallel group pilot randomised controlled trial.",
"One private physiotherapy clinic, northern England.",
"Twenty-four participants with rotator cuff tendinopathy.",
"The intervention was a programme of self-managed loaded exercise. The control group received usual physiotherapy treatment.",
"Baseline assessment comprised the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and the Short-Form 36, repeated three months post randomisation.",
"The recruitment target was met and the majority of participants (98%) were willing to be randomised. 100% retention was attained with all participants completing the SPADI at three months. Exercise adherence rates were excellent (90%). The mean change in SPADI score was -23.7 (95% CI -14.4 to -33.3) points for the self-managed exercise group and -19.0 (95% CI -6.0 to -31.9) points for the usual physiotherapy treatment group. The difference in three month SPADI scores was 0.1 (95% CI -16.6 to 16.9) points in favour of the usual physiotherapy treatment group.",
"In keeping with previous research which indicates the need for further evaluation of self-managed loaded exercise for rotator cuff tendinopathy, these methods and the preliminary evaluation of outcome offer a foundation and stimulus to conduct a substantive study."
],
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23954024: Аннотация ЦЕЛИ: Тининопатия ротаторной манжеты является распространенным источником боли в плече, для которой характерны постоянные и / или рецидивирующие проблемы у части пациентов. Цель этого исследования состояла в том, чтобы опробовать методы, предложенные для проведения предметного исследования, для оценки эффективности программы нагрузок с самостоятельным управлением нагрузкой по сравнению с обычным физиотерапевтическим лечением тендинопатии вращающей манжеты.
DESIGN:
A single-centre pragmatic unblinded parallel group pilot randomised controlled trial.
SETTING:
One private physiotherapy clinic, northern England.
PARTICIPANTS:
Twenty-four participants with rotator cuff tendinopathy.
INTERVENTIONS:
The intervention was a programme of self-managed loaded exercise. The control group received usual physiotherapy treatment.
MAIN OUTCOMES:
Baseline assessment comprised the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and the Short-Form 36, repeated three months post randomisation.
RESULTS:
The recruitment target was met and the majority of participants (98%) were willing to be randomised. 100% retention was attained with all participants completing the SPADI at three months. Exercise adherence rates were excellent (90%). The mean change in SPADI score was -23.7 (95% CI -14.4 to -33.3) points for the self-managed exercise group and -19.0 (95% CI -6.0 to -31.9) points for the usual physiotherapy treatment group. The difference in three month SPADI scores was 0.1 (95% CI -16.6 to 16.9) points in favour of the usual physiotherapy treatment group.
CONCLUSIONS:
In keeping with previous research which indicates the need for further evaluation of self-managed loaded exercise for rotator cuff tendinopathy, these methods and the preliminary evaluation of outcome offer a foundation and stimulus to conduct a substantive study.
(OBJECTIVES
, DESIGN
, SETTING
и т. д. отсутствуют efetch()
аннотация.)
Какие другие метаданные делают efetch()
отсутствует, и есть ли способ программно получить недостающую информацию?
2 ответа
Информация не пропущена:
from Bio import Entrez
Entrez.email = "sample@sample.org"
handle = Entrez.efetch(db="pubmed", id="23954024", rettype="xml")
print(handle.read())
Часть вывода:
<Abstract>
<AbstractText Label="OBJECTIVES" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">Rotator cuff tendinopathy is a common source of shoulder pain characterised by persistent and/or recurrent problems for a proportion of sufferers. The aim of this study was to pilot the methods proposed to conduct a substantive study to evaluate the effectiveness of a self-managed loaded exercise programme versus usual physiotherapy treatment for rotator cuff tendinopathy.</AbstractText>
<AbstractText Label="DESIGN" NlmCategory="METHODS">A single-centre pragmatic unblinded parallel group pilot randomised controlled trial.</AbstractText>
<AbstractText Label="SETTING" NlmCategory="METHODS">One private physiotherapy clinic, northern England.</AbstractText>
[...]
Чтобы расширить ответ xbello, нет, информация не пропущена, но немного скрыта.
from Bio import Entrez
Entrez.email = "Your.Name.Here@example.org"
handle = Entrez.efetch(db="pubmed", id="23954024", rettype="xml")
records = Entrez.read(handle)
for record in records:
m = record['MedlineCitation']['Article']['Abstract']['AbstractText']
for subsection in m:
print(subsection.attributes['Label'])
print(subsection)
Усеченный вывод:
ЦЕЛИ
Тининопатия ротаторной манжеты является распространенным источником боли в плече, характеризующейся постоянными и / или рецидивирующими проблемами у части пациентов. Цель этого исследования состояла в том, чтобы опробовать методы, предложенные для проведения предметного исследования, для оценки эффективности программы нагрузок с самостоятельным управлением нагрузкой по сравнению с обычным физиотерапевтическим лечением тендинопатии ротаторной манжеты.
ДИЗАЙН
Одноцентровое прагматическое неслепое пилотное параллельное групповое рандомизированное контролируемое исследование.